![]() | |
|
| |
| Front Page | |
| Stories | |
| Photos | |
| Schedule | |
| Front Page | |
| Local | |
| Sports | |
| Reds | |
| Bearcats | |
| Xavier | |
| Business | |
| Weather | |
| Traffic | |
| Back Issues | |
| AP Wire | |
| Jobs | |
| Autos | |
| General | |
| Obits | |
| Homes | |
| TV Listings | |
| Movies | |
| Dining | |
| Calendars | |
| Weekend | |
![]() |
Thursday, September 25, 1997 Auditor blasts city on stadium 'Second-guessing' will hurt project, Rhodes says
BY LUCY MAY
"The city was sitting around for two years, and the county came in and saved their bacon," Mr. Rhodes said, referring to the increase in the county sales tax to build new stadiums for the Bengals and Reds. "And what do they get for it? Second-guessing into oblivion."
Mr. Rhodes' blast at the city came in response to statements at council's Community Development Committee meeting Tuesday.
At that session, City Manager John Shirey advised council to withhold the city land needed for the Bengals stadium until the county agrees to the city's plans for riverfront development.
Mr. Shirey said he wasn't trying to be adversarial. But the land is the only leverage the city has in negotiating about riverfront development, and Mr. Shirey said council shouldn't give up that leverage until the city and county reach an agreement.
City Councilman Todd Portune also wants council to ask Mr. Rhodes to conduct a formal review of the county's football stadium budget and financing plans. Council didn't vote on that suggestion Wednesday.
If council formally makes the request, Mr. Rhodes said he would consider it. But Mr. Rhodes said he isn't sure his office has the legal authority to conduct such a review.
"I'm not afraid of saying something's wrong if it's wrong," Mr. Rhodes said.
The auditor's office already has certified that the county's stadium sales tax revenues are sufficient to pay the debt the county will issue to build the Bengals' new riverfront stadium.
But Mr. Portune wants a much more thorough review. Mr. Portune said he and voters are concerned about the project's cost, which is estimated at $400 million when parking, land and initial borrowing costs are included.
Mr. Rhodes said such concerns are "perfectly legitimate" but said he is "a little bit wary" of the city's constant criticism of the county.
"You'd think the city would say, 'Thank you, county,' " he said.
County Commission President Bob Bedinghaus said Wednesday he thinks the city and county will work through riverfront development issues so that council won't face that decision.
Said Commissioner Tom Neyer Jr., "We do have aligned interests here. The citizens of Cincinnati are also citizens of Hamilton County. Cooperation ought not to be difficult, it ought to be intuitive." The county did get some good news about the football stadium project.
Standard & Poor's, the New York ratings agency, gave the county an "A" rating to the $322.7 million in bonds the county will issue to build Paul Brown Stadium.
That's the third-highest rating the agency assigns, and it's what the county was hoping to get.
Earlier this month, Moody's Investors Service gave the bonds a rating of "A2," its second-highest rating.
Mr. Bedinghaus said the county is pleased with the ratings and that they "represent the sound financial basis by which this project is financed."
County officials still are considering insuring their bonds, which would guarantee a triple-A rating and could lead to lower interest payments on the debt.
The cost of insurance already has been included in the Bengals project budget, he said.
Anne Michaud contributed to this report.
|
|
Search | Questions/help | News tips | Letters to the editors Web advertising | Web access | Place a classified | Subscribe | Circulation Copyright 1995-2000. The Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett Co. Inc. newspaper. Use of this site signifies agreement to terms of service updated 4/5/2000. |